Library operations performance objectives: empirical evidence from users’ expectations

Authors

  • Evelyn Ogboo Apronti Tetteh Methodist University Ghana Author
  • Raphael Aryee Ghana Institute of Management and Public Administration image/svg+xml Author
  • Faustina Aryeetey Methodist University Ghana Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.65861/glj.v31i2.4

Keywords:

Library operations, user expectations, operations performance objective, service quality, flexibility, dependability, security, speed

Abstract

This study aims to investigate the expectations of library users based on operations performance objectives (OPO) such as quality, flexibility, speed, dependability, and security of services and resources to adopt a strategic direction in which the creation and delivery of library resources and services would meet the expectations of library users. A survey was conducted to collect data from 506 students of fifteen (15) academic universities in Ghana using questionnaires and the data was analysed descriptively. The results indicated that the general student populace prioritised speed as the key operations performance objective determining user satisfaction with library operations. Besides, undergraduate students prioritised speed and dependability, whereas postgraduate students prioritised flexibility. Finally, the outcome indicated that public university students prioritised dependability higher, while their counterparts in the private sector prioritised quality. Findings of the study might aid the adoption of a strategic direction in which the creation and delivery of library resources and services would meet the expectations of its users.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Aina, L. O. (2019). Libraries, information science education and the Fourth Industrial Revolution in Africa. Journal of the National Institute of Library and Information Science, 4(2), 45–60.

Albrecht, S. (2023). The safe library: Keeping users, staff, and collections secure. Rowman & Littlefield. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5771/9781538169612

Appiah, D. K., Kwaah, C. O., & Dedzoe-Dzokotoe Plockey, F. (2024). Delinquent acts in academic libraries: A case study of three academic libraries in Northern Ghana. Journal of Library Administration, 64(1), 107–118. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01930826.2023.2287948

Armah, N. Y. A. A., & Cobblah, M. A. (2021). An assessment of the multiple challenges associated with students’ access to electronic resources at a public university library in Ghana. International Journal of Knowledge Content Development & Technology, 11(1).

Armstrong, R., & Seng, T. (2000). Corporate customer satisfaction in the banking industry of Singapore. International Journal of Bank Marketing, 18(3), 97–111. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/02652320010339617

Aryee, R., & Tetteh, E. O. A. (2024). Library resources constraints, frustration, and user behavior: An empirical library operations study. Brain and Behavior, 14(7), e3627. https://doi.org/10.1002/brb3.3627 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/brb3.3627

Ashikuzzaman, M. (2014). ICT-based user services of blog. https://www.lisbdnet.com/ict-based-user

Asogwa, B. E., Ugwu, C. I., Asadu, B. U., & Ezema, J. U. (2019). Use of SERVQUAL in the evaluation of service quality of academic libraries in developing countries. Indian Journal of Information Technology (INDJIT), 1(2), 5–22.

Avizienis, A., Laprie, J. C., & Randell, B. (2001). Fundamental concepts of dependability. Department of Computing Science Technical Report Series.

Balog, A. (2011). Testing a multidimensional and hierarchical quality assessment model for digital libraries. Studies in Informatics and Control, 20(3), 233–246. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24846/v20i3y201104

Barfi, K. A., Parbie, S. K., Filson, C. K., Teye, M. V., Kodua-Ntim, K., & Ayensu, E. (2023). Assessing the quality of services at an academic library. Heliyon, 9(12). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e22449

Beach, R., Muhlemann, A. P., Price, D. H. P., Paterson, A., & Sharp, J. (2000). A review of manufacturing flexibility. European Journal of Operational Research, 122(2), 41–57. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-2217(99)00062-4

Cao, G., Liang, M., & Li, X. (2018). How to make the library smart? The conceptualization of the smart library. The Electronic Library, 36(5), 811–825. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/EL-11-2017-0248

Carter, T. (1985). Performance appraisal for reference librarians. Reference Services Review. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/eb048913

Cendón, B. V., & de Almeida Souza, J. L. (2017). A method for measuring satisfaction of users of digital libraries: A case study with engineering faculty. Qualitative and Quantitative Methods in Libraries, 4(1), 11–19.

Cloonan, M. (2004). Notions of flexibility in UK higher education: Core and periphery revisited. Higher Education Quarterly, 58(2–3), 176–197. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2273.2004.00267.x

Dreyer, B., & Grønhaug, K. (2004). Uncertainty, flexibility, and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Business Research, 57(5), 484–494. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0148-2963(02)00315-6

Edwards, R., Clarke, J., Harrison, R., & Reeve, F. (2001). Flexibility at work: A study of further education. Journal of Vocational Education and Training, 53(3), 373–389. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13636820100200167

Enakrire, R. T., & Ocholla, D. N. (2017). Information and communication technologies for knowledge management in academic libraries in Nigeria and South Africa. South African Journal of Information Management, 19(1), 1–9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4102/sajim.v19i1.750

Farid, G., Warraich, N. F., & Iftikhar, S. (2023). Digital information security management policy in academic libraries: A systematic review (2010–2022). Journal of Information Science, Article 01655515231160026. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/01655515231160026

Freeze, R. D., Alshare, K. A., Lane, P. L., & Wen, H. J. (2010). IS success model in e-learning context based on students’ perceptions. Journal of Information Systems Education, 21(2), 173–184.

Fülöp, M., Varga, B. A., & Sebestyen, N. (2025). Competitive and non-competitive school climate and students’ well-being. Learning and Instruction, 95, 102036. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2024.102036

Grechyn, V., & McShane, I. (2021). Seriously, Australia, why are you so stingy with Wi-Fi? Customer satisfaction with Wi-Fi speed in Australian hotels and lessons for public Wi-Fi provision. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Technology, 12(4), 730–744. https://doi.org/10.1108/JHTT-01-2020-0025 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JHTT-01-2020-0025

Gupta, Y. P., & Goyal, S. (1989). Flexibility of manufacturing systems: Concepts and measurement. European Journal of Operational Research, 43(2), 119–135. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-2217(89)90206-3

Gyau, E. B., Liu, J., & Kwakye, O. (2021). Evaluation of user satisfaction with academic library services based on students’ perspectives. Open Access Library Journal, 8(8), 1–17. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4236/oalib.1107783

He, Y., Stecke, K. E., & Smith, M. L. (2016). Robot and machine scheduling with state-dependent part input sequencing in flexible manufacturing systems. International Journal of Production Research, 54(22), 6736–6746. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2016.1161252

Healey, J. F. (2014). Statistics: A tool for social research. Cengage Learning.

Henon, P., Haltman, E., & Dugan, R. F. (2015). Assessing service quality: Satisfying the expectations of library customers. American Library Association.

Hoffman, D. L., & Novak, T. P. (1996). Marketing in hypermedia computer-mediated environments: Conceptual foundations. Journal of Marketing, 60, 50–68. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/002224299606000304

Ibrahim, A. B. (2021). Leveraging emerging technology for public library service in Nigeria. Al-Hikmah Journal of Educational Management and Counselling, 3(1), 213–222.

Isebe, L. M. (2014). Causes and effects of theft and mutilation of information materials in academic library services in Delta State. Information and Knowledge Management, 4(10), 76–82.

Jahan, N., Ali, M. J., & Al Asheq, A. (2020). Examining the key determinants of customer satisfaction in Internet banking services in Bangladesh. Academy of Strategic Management Journal, 19(1), 1–6.

Jaskowska, B. (2020). Organizational flexibility of academic libraries in a VUCA reality: The example of the functioning of libraries during the COVID-19 epidemic. Przegląd Biblioteczny, 88(Special Issue), 70–93. DOI: https://doi.org/10.36702/pb.773

Khamis, F. M. D., & AbRashid, R. (2018). Service quality and customer satisfaction in Tanzania’s Islamic banks: A case study at People’s Bank of Zanzibar (PBZ). Journal of Islamic Marketing, 9(4), 884–900. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JIMA-09-2016-0068

Kumar, A., & Mahajan, P. (2019). Evaluating library service quality of University of Kashmir: A LibQUAL+ survey. Performance Measurement and Metrics. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/PMM-09-2018-0024

Kumar, V., Kumari, A., Garza-Reyes, J. A., & Lim, M. (2013). Dependability is a key element for achieving competitive advantage: A study of information service firms. In IFIP International Conference on Advances in Production Management Systems (pp. 493–500). Springer. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-41266-0_59

Downloads

Published

15-07-2026

How to Cite

Tetteh, E.O.A., Aryee, R. and Aryeetey, F. (2026) “Library operations performance objectives: empirical evidence from users’ expectations”, Ghana Library Journal (ISSN: 3134-5522), 31(2), pp. 25–36. doi:10.65861/glj.v31i2.4.

Similar Articles

1-10 of 167

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.